1 Like

Strengthening democracy, protecting Europe

How has the German Constitution developed from the Weimar Republic via the Bonn Republic to the political system of today? Anniversaries of constitutions are usually introspective affairs, during which academics make observations regarding the state, society and the political situation from an insider perspective.

An international DAAD alumni conference held at the Bocconi University in Milan in June 2019 on the occasion of a double anniversary (100 years since the Weimar Constitution and 70 years of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany) demonstrated how productive it is to provide cross-border, inter-disciplinary analysis of constitutional developments.

Globalisation and populism – pressing issues

Sandro M. Moraldo explained that the goal was to develop “new perspectives” rather than a “ritualised remembrance”. Moraldo is Chairman of the "Alumni DAAD Italien" association and organised the meeting together with Professor Giuseppe Franco Ferrari. Ferrari teaches Law at Bocconi University, which hosted the event. More than one hundred people took part in the event. They included Italian and German practitioners and academic scholars of Constitutional Law, Politics, History and Languages.

The participants analysed the development and significance of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany and subjected it to (self-)critical scrutiny. There was a broad scope of reflection with regard to constitutional law and politics, addressing issues including Weimar influences, changes to the federal order, changes to party systems and Europe's political weight. The pressing issues of globalisation, climate change, migration and populism also occupy the thoughts of students and practitioners of constitutional law

  • DAAD alumni conference in Milan 2019

  • DAAD alumni conference in Milan 2019

  • DAAD alumni conference in Milan 2019

  • Professor Giuseppe Franco Ferrari, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi at the DAAD alumni networking conference in Milan 2019

Confronting populism

In his welcoming address, Mario Monti highlighted the often very close link between constitutional law and politics by citing the example of the dispute over the European Banking Union. Monti is President of Bocconi University and is better known abroad as a former European Commissioner and as the former Prime Minister of Italy. He recalled that the political decision to create a European Financial Supervisory Authority was ultimately heard by the German Federal Constitutional Court, the “guardian of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany”.

At the conference, which was entitled “Germany 2019. Between European Integration and National Sovereignty. The Challenges Ahead for German Constitutionalism 100 Years Since the Weimar Constitution and 70 Years Since the Basic Law”, participants explored the value and impact of the two constitutions. The term “sovereignty” in the title stood for the European phenomenon of populism and nationalism, for which the Italians have coined the word “sovranismo”.

“In recent years, we have seen the traditional parties in crisis and the populist movements gaining momentum,” said Professor Giuseppe Franco Ferrari, who teaches Law at Bocconi University. He commented that the Weimar Constitution has remained a central point of reference in the academic examination of populist and nationalist movements – not only with regard to the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. “Weimar is the key to understanding the European constitutional debate,” he said

With the Weimar Constitution, a parliamentary democracy was established for the first time in Germany. Its terrible failure during the course of the National Socialists' assumption of power in 1933 is a collective reminder of what can happen if there is a lack of societal support for basic principles such as the separation of power and if the constitutional order proves too weak to combat the enemies of democracy.

Ferrari also made the point that Weimar is constantly referenced in current debates. “Whenever democracy seems to be in crisis and democratic institutions erode, the experiences of the Weimar Republic are reawakened in peoples’ consciousness,” he said. 

Alumni DAAD Italia

With almost 4,000 alumni, Italy has one of the highest numbers of former DAAD scholarship holders among European countries. The "Alumni DAAD Italien" association, which organised the conference on “The Challenges Ahead for German Constitutionalism 100 Years Since the Weimar Constitution and 70 Years Since the Basic Law”, is however comparatively young in terms of the rich tradition of academic exchange between Germany and Italy. The association was founded in Rome in September 2016 and currently has 110 members. The Chairman is Professor Sandro M. Moraldo, who grew up in Heidelberg and now teaches German Literature, Language and Culture at the University of Bologna. The association is planning an alumni conference at the Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro entitled “Longevity and ageing: medical, social and political challenges for Europe” in November 2019.


Historical experience of totalitarianism

Professor Jörg Luther of the Università del Piemonte Orientale in Alessandria described Italian interest in the development of the German constitution as part of a “learning process” marked by historical experience of totalitarianism. Luther, who completed his state examinations and doctorate in Germany before continuing his career in law at Italian universities, described the result of this process as “a common post-authoritarian European culture of constitutionalism with colourful contrasts”.

The differences between German and Italian understandings of a constitution are clearly visible in areas including fundamental rights. In Italy, human dignity also means social dignity, “which today must be protected from starvation wages and economic abuse of power,” explained Luther. He went on to say that while in German constitutional jurisprudence the concept of property has been extended, in Italy the protection of fundamental social rights has a unique tradition, citing examples including healthcare and old-age pension schemes.

Protecting democracy

The protection of democracy is also assessed and handled differently. “Italy excludes only neo-fascism and allowed Euro-communism,” said Luther. The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, on the other hand, continued Ferrari, makes it possible to ban any unconstitutional party, whether it is on the extreme left- or right-wing. Ferrari regards Germany as better armed against threats to democracy than Italy in terms of constitutional law.

According to the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, a new head of government must also be elected when a government is overthrown. The aim of this is to prevent political instability. Nevertheless, the established political system in Germany has also fallen into crisis. “Even though the situations in Germany and Italy are not identical, the confrontation with populist and nationalist parties demonstrates the necessity for reform,” said Ferrari.

Ferrari believes that securing democracy, the rule of law and social balance is not the sole task of politicians and that societal support for the values and principles enshrined in the respective constitutions is also necessary. He is however concerned that it is becoming increasingly difficult to build bridges in the face of nationalistic isolationist tendencies. Luther identifies continued deficits in knowledge and understanding with particular regard to the relationship between Italy and Germany. “Stereotypes have again crept in,” he remarked

Author: Katja Gelinsky



August 2019


Ashery Vurugu Tanga, TANZANIA
6 September 2019

Protecting Democracy:
By Ashery Vurugu WOPA TANZANIA
The world does not look to be the same again but life goes on as usual
One question here must occupy the minds of intellectuals worldwide: who is protecting democracy and how long is democracy going to last? In the past when one wanted to learn about democracy he or she would tune to the BBC and watch the House of Commons live or for that matter the USA Congress.
There is no way any democrat can throw human beings alive in the sea waters in the modern Europe while the so called civilized world is watching, perhaps the European Union or the United Nations is going to help. Is a very populous giant Nation that does not subscribe to the principles of Democracy, the Rule of Law but is ready to enjoy the fruits of Democratic Institutions outside its own system threatening democracy and world peace? How about when the giant Nation is annoyed by the small time Nations who is going to prevent it from misusing its reaches and prowess to crush the whole world to its Knees? How is the world preparing itself for that eventuality?
Do not laugh but when I tuned to the BBC or was it perhaps DW Radio and heard that one of the Best Democracies in the world was dismissing her Parliament I thought I was dreaming and believe me or not very quickly I saw the resurrection of Boris Yeltsin and felt so bad for the world!
That something like that could happen in UK that has around fifty Commonwealth Nations basing their Democratic Governance on its style of Democracy must no doubt have sent a shock the whole world.
Africa and the rest of the third world are in danger of soon reverting to the era of Dictatorship and and the one party state.
Electoral Fraud that is installing regimes that should not have been there in the first place is a serious threat on Democratic Rule in the African Continent.
The UK and the International Community EU and the AU must act fast to protect Democracy because the Human race can not be safe without its protection.

Add a comment now